Login or Sign Up

Support Forum

Registration is not required to ask a question. If you're a Pro Club member,
please use our Priority Support page for a faster response.

Ask a Question
All Questions
System Ninja
JavaRa
CCEnhancer
Remembr
Bzzt! Image Editor
Before you ask a question

1. Make sure you're using the most recent version of the program.

2. Try searching the forum, perhaps your problem has already been described and solved.

3. Please provide following info:
– OS architecture (x86 or x64)
– Screenshot if applicable
– Step to reproduce issue

Home Forums Product Support Remembr Support Please provide a stealth-portable version. Reply To: Please provide a stealth-portable version.

#12871
webfork
Guest

Hey I’m a mod over at portable freeware … maybe I can help out with a little background:

Ultimately portable software is more broadly a response to behavior by good software on many platforms throwing information, settings and other garbage all over the computer.   (Android is maybe the worst at this but Windows is guilty too.)  Over time that wastes space, slows down the computer, and is a privacy concern because you’re not in control of your own data.  That means unless you encrypt the *entire* hard drive, you can’t be sure what someone who finds the drive will know about you.

By this reasoning, to call something “stealth” isn’t about subterfuge — it’s about not throwing junk all over the drive.  I’m actually wondering if we picked the wrong word; I thought about calling it “registry green” for a long time now, but I got stuck on the fact that it’s about more than just the registry.

Generally speaking, being self-contained and keeping most changes to the local machine restricted to the local folder means *better* portability, which is why “stealth” or “registry green” status is ideal.  Programs are *less* portable when they write to the registry, AppData, ProgramData, C:\WINDOWS etc.

Thanks for reading all that.  I hope that helps.

Wf